Friday, February 19, 2010
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Cartoon: Obama Does Orwell in Oslo

Click to enlarge
I wasn't planning to do two "Obama is a Mean Old Warmonger" cartoons in a row but come on... accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo with a speech about how war IS peace? Dude was asking for it...
Labels: afghanistan, cwa, obama, toons, war
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Cartoon: Urge to Surge 2: Afghanistan!

Click to enlarge
This is a sequel to my Iraq Surge cartoon from 2007. Just because Obama sounds so calm and reasonable (and can pronounce nuclear) doesn't make the victims of his bloody endless war any less dead or tortured.
As I was sketching this cartoon Sunday I got a comment from a reader wondering why I hadn't expressed my irritation with Obama lately. I told him it was mostly out of disappointment/avoidance, but this surge thing most certainly required comment.
Labels: afghanistan, cwa, obama, toons, war
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
The War in Afghanistan's REAL Victims

Click to enlarge
In the wake of a U.S. airstrike that killed more than 100 Afghan civilians, the mainstream media wonders: "How will those dead kids harm American PR?"
As FAIR puts it in their analysis of mainstream coverage: "One has to wonder about the values of a press where U.S. taxpayer-funded slaughter of civilians elicits journalists' concern not about victims, but about the war's popularity with the population having record numbers of bombs dropped on them and how that might hamper U.S. strategic goals."
By the way, Obama's top security adviser says he has no plans to halt the airstrikes because “we have to have a full complement of our offensive military power when we need it."
For my previous cartoons on this subject, see "War Marketeers!" and "Milly Jones: America-Hating PR representative".
Labels: afghanistan, civilian casualties, cwa, media, war
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
We're so sorry... that you don't understand why we had to kill your kids! Part 2...
A few weeks ago, I did a cartoon about the U.S. trying to spin civilian casualties in Afghanistan.
Well, once again, the U.S. is upset about civilian casualties in Afghanistan. And once again, they're not upset that the U.S. military killed seven children in a "targeted" airstrike, but that those unreasonable Afghan civilians just don't understand it's not REALLY the U.S.'s fault--there was nothing they could do! From the NY Times this morning ("7 Children Killed in Airstrike in Afghanistan"):
Seven children were killed during an airstrike by the United States-led coalition against a religious compound thought to be a Qaeda sanctuary in remote eastern Afghanistan, the coalition said Monday.The article goes on to say that the toll may rise to about 180 once the death toll from another airstrike are confirmed. But as for these murdered children, the U.S. had stock apologies and little sympathy:The death of the children on Sunday may well add to the crescendoing anger many Afghans feel about civilian casualties from American and NATO military operations. More than 130 civilians have been killed in airstrikes and shootings in the past six months, according to Afghan authorities.
The air raid against the religious compound was a targeted strike rather than a pitched battle. “We are truly sorry for the innocent lives lost in this attack,” said Maj. Chris Belcher of the United States Army about Sunday’s raid against several structures, including a school and mosque, in Paktika Province, near the border with Pakistan.And
The American ambassador, William B. Wood, said the coalition went to extraordinary lengths to avoid civilian casualties. “Unfortunately, when the Taliban are using civilians in this tactical way, instances of civilian casualties, just like instances of casualties from friendly fire, cannot be completely avoided,” he said.
Consider those hearts and minds WON.
Crossposted at Search & Destroy: The Rallblog.
Labels: afghanistan, anti-war, civilian casualties, war
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
New Toon: War Marketeers!

Inspired by a quote from a recent New York Times piece, "Civilian Casualties Undermine Allies' War on Taliban":
The subject of civilian casualties was the source of intense discussion on Wednesday in Brussels when the NATO secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, met with the North Atlantic Council, the top representatives of the coalition. But the conversation was less about how to reduce casualties, according to participants, than about how to explain them to European governments.And...
“If your mortars are not getting you out, you call in close air support and that will be less precise,” said one senior American official who follows the action in Afghanistan closely. “We know that the Taliban hide in villages. The job that we have not done as well is making it clear to European publics that it’s the Taliban who are exploiting the civilians.”
In other words: we don't need to try harder to avoid killing, torturing and bombing the crap out civilians, we just need to spin it better!
Labels: afghanistan, anti-war, cartoons, iraq, war